Ancient Aliens: Evidence of Stephen Hawking’s Claim that “Philosophy is Dead”

Note: This article was cited in the New York Times (July 22, 2018) as an counter that is intellectual the emerging religion of “Ancient Aliens.”

The Grand Design (2012), Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow claimed that “philosophy is dead” (p in the book. 5). They wrote: “We exist but for a few days, plus in that time explore but a small the main whole universe. But humans are a curious species. We wonder, we seek answers. Residing in this vast world that is by turns kind and cruel, and gazing at the immense heavens above, folks have always asked a variety of questions: How can we comprehend the world in which we find ourselves? How does the universe behave? What’s the nature of reality? Where d > philosophy is dead. Philosophy have not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics.” (p. 5).

Needless to say, philosophy continues to be alive in academic journals, Amazon books, plus the philosophy that is shrinking at the Barnes & Noble bookstores. But, as a force in popular culture, contemporary philosophy is basically dead, primarily because it has did not carry on with with all the discoveries in contemporary cosmology. Within the wake of this stunning achievements regarding the Apollo program together with Hubble Space Telescope (just two examples), philosophy has failed to generate a well known narrative that is cosmic integrates the origins and destinies of the human species to the vast and wondrous cosmos—an expanding universe stretching across 100 billion light years and populated with 2 trillion galaxies and untold variety of stars, planets, lifeforms, and black holes. This death began using the crash of Apollo 8 and Earthrise.

This cosmic and failure that is philosophical ev >2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Interstellar (2014), Hollywood populates the expanding universe with endless monsters (ex: the Alien series) and apocalyptic warfare (ex: Star Wars), complimented by almost no awe, wonder, and discovery. The recent Star Trek films are not that distinct from Star Wars. Here we have been fifty years after Apollo and thirty years after the Hubble telescope, plus the dominant ideologies continue to be located in cosmic narcissism and super-specialness—pretending that is human function as the center of the universe or under the delusion that a Creator or Ancient Aliens are searching out for us.

The hit television series Ancient Aliens (2010-) has hijacked the cosmic narratives from Apollo and 2001 and claims to explain humanity’s origins and destiny in the universe in the absence of a meaningful space philosophy. In Ancient Aliens, we can see philosophy’s corpse that is mediated where an attempted space philosophy and cosmic narrative have crashed and generally are still aflame in America in the History Channel.

Two Val >The ancient-astronaut theory draws upon two val > may are suffering from space travel technologies that enable them to traverse the distances that are great relative ease. At least that is the “wormhole” scenario depicted in touch (1997) and Interstellar (2014) . That sa > it is highly unlikely we have been visited, precisely as the distances are so vast, the universe is so gigantic, and our planet is indeed tiny.

Yet, such a possibility (however slim) is certainly one reason why 2001 offers such a compelling vision of human origins and destinies. All things considered, it might be an moment that is epochal find a black monolith somewhere in the world or even the moon, beaming out a radio signal to an alert and curious species. Such a possibility is quite popular with me, at the least the theory is that. Since the astronaut Taylor says in Planet for the Apes, “Out there, there has to be something better than man. Needs to be.” Needless to say, if ancient astronauts have visited Earth, they might have possessed extremely advanced technologies and been regarded as gods, angels, and miracle makers by premodern humans. Just like the apes in 2001, the humans would have looked at the technologies with amazement and fear. But have any ancient astronauts actually visited Earth?

Where’s the black monolith?

Where’s the same as the black monolith in 2001 — that single artifact of indisputable extraterrestrial design or origin? Where may be the evidence that is verifiable ancient astronauts or extraterrestrials visited our world to enlighten our species, perform great deeds, and guide our art, technology, and architecture? Since I think extraterrestrial life forms surely exist also it’s possible some could be much more advanced and enlightened than our species, i will be open to actual empirical evidence. Unfortunately, all the ancient-astronaut theorists can point toward is a few mysterious artifacts, none of that could be linked to visitations that are extraterrestrial.

Where will be the “Chariots associated with Gods”?

Within my youth, I watched reruns or VHS tapes of 2001 and Planet associated with the Apes several times, along with a number of other science-fiction films. I also recall viewing reruns of Chariots of this Gods and Mysteries of this Gods, which aired from the local television station. The shows are now available on YouTube, and my viewings that are recent most of my original memories of them. Both films clearly attempted to connect astronauts that are ancient Apollo and space exploration, aided by the Voyager space probe and starship Enterprise appearing early in Mysteries of this Gods. Viewing the above films in my youth inspired me to read Chariots regarding the Gods?, readily available at the time in local bookstores. I viewed the films and read the book with rapt attention, precisely because von Daniken seemed to be providing “evidence” for a person narrative that was part of a bigger celestial narrative outside of the theism that prevailed in Texas, where I happened to be born and grew up (in a largely secular household). Initially, this thesis was quite attractive and appeared to reflect an alternative model for human origins and possible destinies. It appeared like a attack that is plausible the cultural and historical orthodoxy of the age, particularly the pre-Copernican ideologies associated with the proselytizing evangelicals during my suburb.

Upon later reflection, however, I found myself questioning the logic of this book’s assertions and came to realize that von Daniken’s “ancient-astronaut” thesis was deeply mistaken. The book’s flaws were exposed in a 1976 Skeptical Inquirer article as well as in a book entitled The Space Gods Revealed that featured a forward by none aside from Carl Sagan.1 By 1977, Chariot of the Gods? was debunked in a BBC-PBS production of Nova in an episode called “The Case associated with Ancient Astronauts.”2 The episode refuted the next claims: a graphic of an astronaut that is ancient carved on a Mayan sarcophagus, the Nazca Lines in Peru were originally an ancient-astronaut spaceport, ancient astronauts inspired various carvings on Peruvian stones, and ancient astronauts built the pyramids in Egypt in addition to Moai statues on Easter Island.

The above mentioned assertions are among the most ludicrous and illogical interpretations of human artifacts created by the theorists that are ancient-astronaut and all sorts of are wholly unproven. In many ways, the series is an attack on logic, rationality, and also the nature of ev >Ancient Aliens happens to be on tv for seven seasons suggests there are sizable audiences who will be quite gullible, not able to think logically, and scientifically illiterate. Plus, there are irresponsible and intellectually bankrupt television programmers, but that’s nothing new either.

In the wake of the Trump pres >Chariots associated with the Gods? and Ancient Aliens, almost all for the so-called ev >never be solved.

Virtually all the claims of extraterrestrial influence made on Ancient Aliens assume that human civilization and consciousness don’t have a lot of creativity, originality, or capacity to innovate. The basic idea is that, without some help from the ancient astronauts, humans would be helpless and could never build such great structures or make profound website that makes essays for you scientific discoveries. Plus, the show assumes there is absolutely no available room for chance, surprise, emergence, singularities, or some of the insights of chaos and complexity theory. In the end, the series represents an assault on rationality and scientific methods, not unlike all other paranormal movies and television shows.